Senior outside perspective

Infrastructure advisory for teams making decisions that are hard to unwind.

I help engineering teams review cloud architecture, Terraform/OpenTofu structure, CI/CD workflows, platform engineering direction, reliability practices, and AI-driven operational risk before those decisions turn into expensive production problems.

Architecture Reviews Terraform / OpenTofu CI/CD Governance Platform Strategy Reliability AI-Era Operational Risk

Outside perspective, not staff augmentation.

This is strategic review and guidance for engineering teams that need senior technical judgment, not another set of hands writing tickets.

I am not coming in to become your ticket queue or to write every Terraform module. I'm here to help your team see risks earlier, reason through tradeoffs, and make better decisions in the rooms where those decisions actually get made.

The work is structured, bounded, and documented. You walk away with clarity, prioritized recommendations, and shared language inside your team โ€” not a dependency on me.

The kinds of pain this work resolves.

If two or three of these sound familiar, advisory is probably the right wedge.

๐Ÿงฑ

Terraform or Terragrunt has grown messy and nobody trusts the structure anymore.

๐Ÿ”

CI/CD workflows are powerful but increasingly hard to govern, audit, or change safely.

๐ŸŽŸ๏ธ

Platform engineering is becoming a support queue instead of a product with adoption.

๐Ÿค–

AI tools and agents are entering engineering workflows without clear permission boundaries.

๐Ÿ’ธ

Cloud cost, reliability, and ownership are getting tangled together โ€” and decisions slow down.

๐Ÿšš

Teams are preparing for a migration, redesign, or scaling phase and need an outside read first.

๐Ÿ“Š

Engineering leadership needs a clear, technical outside read on infrastructure risk.

Pick the shape that fits the problem.

Most engagements start with a fixed-scope review. Retainers come after trust โ€” but they're available day one when the problem is clear.

MOST COMMON FIRST ENGAGEMENT
Most common first step

Infrastructure Strategy Review

A fixed-scope review of your architecture, workflows, risks, and operating model. Bounded engagement, written deliverable, prioritized next steps.

Best forTeams that want a clear outside opinion on what's working, what's risky, and what to prioritize next.
Investment
Request a Review โ†’
Timely & differentiated

AI-Era Infrastructure Risk Review

A focused review of where AI-assisted delivery, CI/CD, automation, secrets, permissions, and SaaS integrations create operational blast radius.

Best forTeams adopting AI tools, coding agents, CI/CD automation, or internal developer platforms.
Investment
Request an AI Review โ†’
Ongoing partnership

Advisory Retainer

Ongoing access to a senior infrastructure advisor for recurring architecture, platform, reliability, and AI-risk decisions. Async + scheduled sessions.

Best forEngineering leaders and platform teams that want a senior outside voice without hiring a full-time staff/principal engineer.
Investment
Discuss a Retainer โ†’

The shape of the deliverable.

Bounded, structured, and useful โ€” designed to leave behind clarity, not dependency.

Intake session
Artifact & repo review
Live working session
Written findings memo
Prioritized recommendations
Optional leadership readout
Optional retainer follow-up

What this isn't.

Honest scope so the wrong buyers self-select out.

Advisory doesn't include:

  • Day-to-day ticket execution
  • Emergency break/fix production support
  • Writing all your Terraform for you
  • Replacing your internal DevOps team
  • Vendor implementation disguised as strategy
  • Long-term staff-augmentation contracts

Get senior infrastructure judgment in the room.

Most engagements start with a quick intake call to confirm fit, scope, and timing. No long sales cycle.

Scroll to Top