Platform Engineering Advisory for Internal Platform Teams
Platform engineering after the Kubernetes gold rush is less about picking tools and more about whether anyone uses what you built. Adoption stalls when paved roads do not match how teams actually work, support boundaries are unclear, and governance quietly becomes a tax. This advisory engagement is an outside read on your platform operating model: what you are building, who it is for, and whether the economics and support load are sustainable.
It is not a portal pitch and it is not staff augmentation. The goal is to help your platform leaders make better product, governance, and staffing decisions — with plain-language tradeoffs and a prioritized roadmap your team can own.
What’s included
- Intake on platform scope, customers, adoption metrics, and support load
- Review of paved roads, self-service paths, and team feedback loops
- Assessment of governance, standards, and where platform becomes a bottleneck
- Written memo: adoption risks, support-boundary gaps, and economic tradeoffs
- Prioritized recommendations for roadmap, staffing, and governance
- Optional leadership readout for directors weighing platform investment
Who it’s for
Platform engineering leads, staff/principal platform engineers, and infrastructure directors building or rescuing an internal developer platform.
Start with Platform Engineering Advisory.
Most engagements start with a quick intake call to confirm fit, scope, and timing — no long sales cycle. Tell us about your team, your systems, and the decisions you’re weighing.
Discuss Platform Advisory → ← All advisory servicesWant a feel for how Brian thinks first? Browse the Platform Engineering episodes on Ship It Weekly.